Construction of evaluation index system of innovation degree of pharmaceutical achievements

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2022.01.024

Abstract

Abstract: At each stage of drug development process, a multi-dimensional evaluation is required to determine the value of numerous drug achievements. Starting from the concept of innovation, combining relevant literature and standards, and under the principle of scientific and practical consideration, a standardized evaluation system of “four-level technological innovation degree” suitable for modern drug research and development achievements is constructed, which plays an important role for information users to understand the potential value of pharmaceutical achievements.

Key words: drug development, technological achievements, innovation degree, standardized evaluation, index system

CLC Number:

R951

Guo Xiangyu, Cao Wanxin, Zhou Xiaoyu, Gao Wen, Zhang Shenghai. Construction of evaluation index system of innovation degree of pharmaceutical achievements[J]. Medical Education Management, 2022, 8(1): 127-132.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

URL: https://journal06.magtechjournal.com/Jwk3_yyyzlt/EN/10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2022.01.024

https://journal06.magtechjournal.com/Jwk3_yyyzlt/EN/Y2022/V8/I1/127

References ［16］

［1］	Yeo W, Kim S, Park H, et al. A bibliometric method for measuring the degree of technological innovation［J］. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 2015, 95: 152-162.
［2］	Wang I K, Seidle R. The degree of technological innovation: a demand heterogeneity perspective［J］. Technol Forecast Soc Change, 2017, 125: 166-177.
［3］	Koc T, Bozdag E. Measuring the degree of novelty of innovation based on Porters value chain approach［J］. Eur J Oper Res, 2017, 257(2): 559-567.
［4］	Szymanski D M, Kroff M W, Troy L C. Innovativeness and new product success: insights from the cumulative evidence［J］. J Acad Mark Sci, 2007, 35(1): 35-52.
［5］	Danneels E, Kleinschmidt E J. Product innovativeness from the firms perspective: its dimensions and their relation with project selection and performance［J］. J Prod Innov Manage, 2001, 18(6): 357-373.
［6］	Padro L C, Andreassi T, Brito L A L. Marketing capability, technical capability or degree of product innovation: what really matters in leveraging the sales of technology-based start-ups?［J］. Int J Entrep Innov Manag, 2019, 23(3): 281-300.
［7］	Calantone R J, Di Benedetto C A, Bhoovaraghavan S. Examining the relationship between degree of innovation and new product success［J］. J Bus Res, 1994, 30(2): 143-148.
［8］	卫汉华. 产品创新度、决策取向与创新绩效的关系研究［D］. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2011.
［9］	辛嘉诚, 王孝凡. 开放式创新度对企业绩效影响的文献综述［J］. 河南财政税务高等专科学校学报, 2019, 33(2): 23-30.
［10］	李振东, 张慧颖. 两阶段竞争中不同创新度产品的市场博弈分析［J］. 管理学报, 2019, 16(3): 456-464.
［11］	刘彦华. 社会网络、产品创新度对网店创业绩效的影响研究［D］. 北京: 北京交通大学, 2018.
［12］	卫汉华, 田也壮, 张曙. 产品创新度研究评述［J］. 中国制造业信息化, 2011, 40(3): 1-5.
［13］	卫汉华, 田也壮, 杨洋, 等. 产品创新度与创新绩效: 技术波动程度的调节作用［J］. 研究与发展管理, 2011, 23(2): 8-16.
［14］	郭翔宇. 药品注册分类的历史演进与我国药品监管理念的创新——新旧《药品注册管理办法》比较［J］. 医学教育管理, 2020, 6(3): 297-303.
［15］	郭翔宇. 不要“曲解”医药创新［J］. 中国医药技术经济与管理, 2009, 3(11): 54-59.
［16］	Ward D J, Slade A, Genus T, et al. How innovative are new drugs launched in the UK? A retrospective study of new drugs listed in the British National Formulary (BNF) 2001-2012［J］. BMJ Open, 2014, 4(10): e006235.

[1]	Ban Zhisen, Guan Zhongjun. Construction of performance evaluation index system for research physicians in teaching hospitals based on Delphi method [J]. Medical Education Management, 2022, 8(5): 615-619,626.
[2]	Liu Qijun, Tong Kuang, Zhang Chunhui, Wen Qing, Cai Pu. Construction and application of curriculum evaluation index system under the value orientation of “golden course” —taking Southern Medical University as an example [J]. Medical Education Management, 2022, 8(4): 383-389.
[3]	Wen Qing, Tong Kuang, Zhang Chunhui, Liu Qijun, Cai Pu. Construction and application effects of classroom teaching evaluation index system under the value orientation of “golden course” —taking Southern Medical University as an example [J]. Medical Education Management, 2022, 8(4): 390-395.
[4]	Cai Pu, Wen Qing, Tong Kuang , Zhang Chunhui, Lv Shuangle, Yang Tingting, Wen Mingang . Construction and practice of teaching performance evaluation index system in secondary colleges in higher education institutions—taking Southern Medical University as an example [J]. Medical Education Management, 2022, 8(4): 396-401.
[5]	Zhang Xinnan, Yang Yi, Zhang Renyun, Yin Rong, Wu Xiaohu, Qian Liling, Zhou Wenhao. Construction of training and selection evaluation system of research-oriented clinicians [J]. Medical Education Management, 2022, 8(2): 221-225,236.
[6]	He Qixun, Ma Xiaorui, Wu Ping. Quality evaluation index system of postgraduate students using Delphi technique and Analytic Hierarchy Process [J]. Medical Education Management, 2022, 8(1): 101-105，126.
[7]	Zhang Ying, Wu Ping. Research on the shared performance evaluation index system of large-scale instruments and equipment in medical universities [J]. Medical Education Management, 2020, 6(3): 304-309.
[8]	Chen Mingjun, Chen Jixiang, Yan Jing. Study on academic ethics evaluation index system of medical postgraduates [J]. Medical Education Management, 2019, 5(6): 525-530.
[9]	Xie Qianchi, Zhao Ying, Zhu Miao. Construction of comprehensive evaluation index system of teaching ability in medical colleges and universities [J]. Medical Education Management, 2019, 5(5): 440-443.
[10]	Wang Xiaoying， Fu Tinghui， Deng Xiaohong. Analysis of training capability in standardized resident training bases of obstetrics in Beijing [J]. Medical Education Management, 2018, 4(2): 131-136.
[11]	Li Jie， Wang Xiaomin. Research on evaluation index system of scientific research competitiveness of medical universities in China [J]. Medical Education Management, 2018, 4(2): 168-172.
[12]	Zhou Shuduo, Wang Qiuyu. Construction of financial index system for evaluating the effects of economic operation in public hospitals [J]. Medical Education Management, 2017, 3(3): 234-239.
[13]	Zhu Miao. Application of Delphi method in the evaluation index system of university continuing education training program [J]. Medical Education Management, 2016, 2(2): 449-453.