医学教育管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6): 721-727.doi: 10. 3969/j. issn. 2096-045X. 2025. 06. 016

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学研究生自评科研能力及影响因素的队列研究

杨昆 1, 赵妍 2, 王雪 3 ,郭艳苏 4 ,朱庆双 2 ,卢洁 2,5*   

  1. 1. 首都医科大学宣武医院国家神经疾病医学中心,北京 100053;2. 首都医科大学宣武医院教育处,北京 100053;3. 首都医科大学宣武医院医学信息研究室/图书馆,北京 100053;4. 首都医科大学宣武医院循证医学中心,北京 100053;5. 首都医科大学宣武医院放射与核医学科,北京 100053
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-24 修回日期:2025-05-13 出版日期:2025-12-20 发布日期:2026-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 卢洁 E-mail:yangkun_1123@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    1. 北京市教育科学“十四五”规划 2022 年度一般课题项目(CEDB22183);2. 北京市教育科学“十三五”规划课题项目(CHDB2020174)

A Cohort Study on medical postgraduates' self-evaluated research competence and its influencing factors#br#

Yang Kun1, Zhao Yan2, Wang Xue3, Guo Yansu4, Zhu Qingshuang2, Lu Jie2, 5*   

  1. 1. National Center for Neurological Disorders, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China; 2. Education Department, Xuanwu Hospital,  Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China; 3.Medical Information Research Lab/Medical Library, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China; 4. Center for Evidence-based Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China; 5. Department of Radiation and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2025-03-24 Revised:2025-05-13 Online:2025-12-20 Published:2026-01-15

摘要: 目的 系统调查医学硕士生和博士生的科研动机、成果表现、培养需求以及影响因素。方法 对某医科大学直属教学医院 58 名硕士、47 名博士,共计 105 名研究生进行队列研究,分别在入学时(2021 年 12 月)和毕业前(2024 年 2月)使用经信效度验证的科研能力自评量表(66 项,Cronbach ’s α=0. 908-0. 971)进行线上测评,比较硕士生和博士生在科研能力和科研成果上的差异及变化。结果 博士生因热爱科研攻读研究生的比例高于硕士生(63. 8% vs. 37. 9%,P=0. 008)。与入学时相比,毕业时共同作者发表 SCI 论文比例,博士生从 42. 6% 升至 58. 1%,硕士生从 5. 2% 升至41. 2%(均 P<0. 001)。硕士生在检索能力(+5. 22 分)、撰写能力(+5. 84 分)和学术能力(+5. 45 分)上有提升(均 P<0. 001)。博士生在发现能力(P=0. 12)和解决问题能力(P=0. 319)方面变化无统计学意义。相较于博士,临床工作占用时间多、压力大(51% vs. 27. 9%,P=0. 023)是硕士生科研能力培养的限制因素。结论 根据学位层次进行差异化培养,建立灵活的实验室管理策略、加强远程数据收集方法和完善远程科研支持系统具有重要作用。

关键词: 医学研究生, 科学研究, 科研能力, 公共卫生事件, 影响因素, 队列研究

Abstract: Objective To systematically examine research motivation, scholarly output, training needs, and influencing factors among medical graduate students. Methods A cohort of 105 medical graduate students (58 master and 47 doctoral candidates) from a university-affiliated hospital was assessed.  Research competencies were self-assessed using a validated online scale at enrollment and again prior to graduation. Results Doctoral students were more likely than master's students to pursue their degree out of a passion for research (63. 8% vs 37. 9%, P=0. 008).  The proportion with at least one co-authored SCI-indexed journal article increased from 42. 6% to 58. 1% among doctoral students and from 5. 2% to 41. 2% among master's students (both P<0. 001).  Master's students showed significant score increases in literature-search competency (+5. 22), academic writing (+5. 84), and scholarly competency (+5. 45) (all P<0. 001), whereas doctoral students showed no significant change in problem-identification (P=0. 120) or problem-solving (P=0. 319) competencies. Compared with doctoral students, master's students more frequently cited heavy clinical workload and time pressure as constraints on research training (51. 0% vs 27. 9%, P=0. 023). Conclusion Research training strategies should be tailored to degree levels.  Key measures identified include implementing flexible laboratory management strategies, enhancing remote data collection methods, and strengthening remote research support systems.

Key words: medical graduate students, scientific research, research capability, public health emergencies, influencing factors, cohort studies

中图分类号: