医学教育管理

• 临床教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学人文实践在传染病临床教学中的融入与效果评价

  

  1. 1.首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院肿瘤内科,北京 100069; 2.首都医科大学基础临床联合实验室,北京100069; 3.首都医科大学附属北京佑安医院教育处,北京 100069
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-07 修回日期:2025-07-29 出版日期:2026-04-10 发布日期:2026-04-10
  • 基金资助:

    1.北京市医管中心登峰“人才”培养计划项目(DFL20021502);2.首都医科大学教育教学改革研究课题(2023JYY280)

Integration and effect evaluation of medical humanistic practice in infectious diseases clinical education

  1. 1. Department of Oncology, Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China; 2. Basic and Clinical Medicine Joint Laboratory, Capital Medical University Beijing 100069, China; 3. Department of Education, Beijing You'an Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2026-07-07 Revised:2025-07-29 Online:2026-04-10 Published:2026-04-10

摘要: 目的 观察将医学人文实践应用在医学生传染病临床教学上的效果,探讨其在提升医学生共情能力及专业素养方面的价值。方法 选取2023年1—12月期间接受传染病学课程临床见习的2个班共80名学生,每班按照1∶1随机分成试验组和对照组,试验组在传染病临床教学中加入医学人文实践新教学方法,对照组采取传统教学方法,两组教学前后进行杰斐逊共情量表调查评分、人文实践考核以及传染病学考核成绩比较。结果 教学结束后,试验组人文实践考核[(6.89±0.68)分 vs (5.80±0.64)分,P<0.001]、杰斐逊共情量表评分[(113.00±16.25)分 vs (104.97±10.04)分,P=0.030]均显著高于对照组;在问诊与体格检查[(95.20±2.09)分 vs (90.52±6.43)分,P<0.001]、病历书写[(95.30±2.12)分 vs (89.27±4.13)分,P<0.001]以及以问题为基础的教学[(97.57±0.67)分 vs (96.77±1.27)分,P=0.001]考核中试验组得分显著高于对照组。结论 医学人文实践融入传染病临床教学中可有效提高医学生的共情能力以及临床实践能力,是提升传染病学教学质量的有效途径。

Abstract:

 Objective To observe the effectiveness of applying medical humanistic practice in the clinical teaching of infectious diseases for medical students, and to explore its value in improving students' empathy ability and professional literacy.Methods A total of 80 students from January 2023 to December 2023 were selected from 2 classes for clinical internship of infectious diseases, including 40 students in each class. Each class was randomly divided into an observation group and a control group at a ratio of 1∶1. The practice of medical humanities was integrated into the clinical teaching of epidemiology as a new teaching method for the observation group, while the control group only adopted the traditional teaching method. The Jefferson Empathy Scale scores, humanities practice assessment results, and infectious diseases examination scores were compared between the two groups before and after teaching.Results After teaching, the observation group had significantly higher humanities practice assessment scores [(6.89±0.68) point vs (5.80 ± 0.64)point, P<0.001)] and Jefferson Scale of Empathy scores [(113.00±16.25) points vs (104.97±10.04) points, P=0.030) ]than the control group. The observation group also achieved significantly higher scores in history taking and physical examination [(95.20 ± 2.09) points vs 90.52 ± 6.43) points, P<0.001 ], medical record writing [(95.30 ± 2.12) points vs (89.27 ± 4.13) points, P< 0.001)], and problem-based learning assessment[ (97.57 ± 0.67) points vs (96.77 ± 1.27) point, P=0.001)].Conclusion Integrating medical humanistic practice into clinical teaching of infectious diseases can improve medical students' empathic capacity and clinical practice ability, and is an effective approach to enhancing the teaching quality of infectious diseases.

中图分类号: