医学教育管理

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

AI临床思维训练系统在超声住院医师规范化培训中的应用价值

  

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院超声医学科,北京 100020
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-24 修回日期:2026-01-23 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-13
  • 基金资助:
    1.国家自然科学基金项目(82572228);2.北京自然科学基金项目(7252282)

Application value of AI clinical reasoning training system in standardized residency training for ultrasound medicine

  1. Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China)

  • Received:2025-11-24 Revised:2026-01-23 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-13

摘要:

 目的 探讨基于真实病例库与DeepSeek大语言模型的人工智能(artificial intelligenceAI)临床思维训练系统在超声医学住院医师规范化培训中的教学效果。方法 选取202312月至20256月期间参加超声住院医师规范化培训的42名学员作为研究对象,采用随机分组方法将其分为观察组与对照组,每组各21名。对照组实施传统讲授式教学与病例讨论相结合的常规培训模式;观察组在常规培训基础上,辅以基于真实病例库与DeepSeek大语言模型的AI临床思维训练系统进行强化训练,干预周期为3个月。培训结束后,通过统一设计的超声临床思维能力考核量表对两组学员进行评估,比较考核成绩差异,并从病史信息整合能力、超声图像解读能力、鉴别诊断全面性及诊断准确性4个维度进行深入分析;同时,采用问卷调查两组学员对培训模式的主观满意度。结果 考核结果显示,观察组临床思维能力考核总分[(91.14±2.20)分]显著高于对照组[(84.62±3.02)分],组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001)。多维度分析表明,观察组在病史信息整合能力、鉴别诊断全面性及诊断准确性3个方面的得分均优于对照组(P<0.001);而在超声图像识别与解读能力方面,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。问卷调查结果提示,观察组在提升理论联系实际能力、增强自主学习能力、深化临床思维训练等5个维度的满意度均达到100%,显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 在超声医学住院医师规范化培训中,引入基于真实病例与大语言模型的AI临床思维训练系统进行辅助教学,可有效提升住院医师的临床思维水平与综合诊断能力,尤其在强化病史整合、拓展鉴别诊断思路及提高诊断准确性方面表现突出,并有助于提高教学满意度。本研究为人工智能技术在超声医学临床思维系统化培养中的实践应用提供了有益参考。

Abstract:


AbstractObjective We conducted a study to investigate the efficacy of an AI clinical reasoning training system, based on a real case database and the DeepSeek large language model in the standardized residency training for ultrasound medicine.Methods A total of 42 ultrasound residents trained between December 2023 and June 2025 were selected as study subjects and randomly assigned to an observation group (n=21) and a control group (n=21). The control group received traditional conventional training, while the observation group supplemented conventional training with the AI clinical reasoning training system for three months. After the training, a standardized ultrasound clinical reasoning ability assessment was conducted to compare the scores between the two groups, analyzing multiple dimensions including medical history taking integration, image interpretation, differential diagnosis, and diagnostic accuracy. A questionnaire survey was used to assess trainees' satisfaction with the teaching outcomes.Results The assessment results showed that the total score of clinical reasoning ability in the observation group (91.14±2.20) was significantly higher than that in the control group (84.62±3.02) (P<0.001). Multidimensional analysis revealed that the observation group significantly outperformed the control group in history taking integration, comprehensiveness of differential diagnosis, and diagnostic accuracy (all P<0.001). However, no significant difference was found in ultrasound image recognition and interpretation between the two groups (P>0.05). The questionnaire survey indicated that the observation group's satisfaction reached 100% across all five aspects: improving theory-practice integration, enhancing self-directed learning ability, and strengthening clinical reasoning, which was significantly higher than that of the control group (all P<0.05). Conclusion In standardized residency training for ultrasound medicine, the supplementary use of the AI clinical reasoning training system can effectively enhance residents' clinical reasoning ability and diagnostic proficiency, with significant effects particularly in history taking integration, differential diagnosis, and diagnostic accuracy, while also achieving higher teaching satisfaction. This study provides empirical evidence for the application of artificial intelligence technology in the systematic cultivation of clinical reasoning in ultrasound medicine education.

中图分类号: