医学教育管理

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学生自主学习能力评价指标体系的构建

  

  1. 天津医科大学公共卫生学院,天津 300070
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-07 修回日期:2025-10-20 出版日期:2026-04-10 发布日期:2026-04-10
  • 基金资助:

    1.天津市教学成果重点培育项目(PYGJ-B023);2.天津医科大学教育教学研究项目(2023jxyb01,2023jxzd03)

Construction of an evaluation index system for medical students' autonomous learning ability

  1. School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300070, China
  • Received:2025-07-07 Revised:2025-10-20 Online:2026-04-10 Published:2026-04-10

摘要:

目的 构建医学生自主学习能力评价指标体系,为评价学习效果、指导自主学习的顺利开展提供科学依据。方法 通过文献研究法初步设计自主学习能力指标体系初评框架,运用德尔菲法对该框架开展2轮咨询确定最终评价指标体系,应用层次分析法确定指标权重。结果 215名专家咨询的积极系数均为100%,权威系数分别为0.4870.9360.8060.9532轮指标变异系数分别为0.060.430.000.24,肯德尔和谐系数(Kendall's W)分别为0.3840.456P<0.001)。最终形成的评价体系包括5个一级指标、14个二级指标和36个三级指标,从自我认识能力、自我规划能力、自我调控能力、探究与协作能力和学习评价5个方面对医学生自主学习能力进行评价。结论 本研究构建的评价体系,具有较强的科学性、可靠性和实用性,其信度、效度及应用效果还需进一步的评估。

Abstract:

 Objective To construct an evaluation index system for medical students' autonomous learning ability, so as to provide a scientific basis for assessing learning effectiveness and guiding the successful implementation of autonomous learning.Methods A preliminary framework of the autonomous learning ability index system was initially designed through literature research. Two rounds of consultation were conducted using the Delphi method to determine the final evaluation index system, and the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was applied to determine the index weights.Results The positive coefficients of 15 experts in the two rounds of consultation were both 100%, with authority coefficients ranging from 0.487 to 0.936 and 0.806 to 0.953, respectively. The variation coefficients of the indicators in the two rounds were 0.06~0.43 and 0.00~0.24, respectively, and Kendall's concordance coefficients were 0.384 and 0.456(both P<0.001). The final revised evaluation system included 5 first-level indicators, 14 second-level indicators, and 36 third-level indicators, which evaluate the autonomous learning ability of medical students from five aspects: self-awareness ability, self-planning ability, self-regulation ability, inquiry and collaboration ability, and learning evaluation.Conclusion The evaluation system constructed in this study demonstrates strong scientific rigor, reliability, and practicality, and its reliability, validity and application effect still need further evaluation.

Key words:

 , medical students|autonomous learning| Delphi method| indicator system| learning evaluation

中图分类号: