医学教育管理

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于德尔菲法的医学院校教师线上教学质量评估指标体系构建

  

  1. 1.贵州医科大学公共卫生与健康学院,贵阳 561113; 2.贵州医科大学医院管理处,贵阳 561113; 3.贵州医科大学教学质量监控与评估办公室,贵阳 561113

  • 收稿日期:2025-09-22 修回日期:2025-10-24 出版日期:2026-04-10 发布日期:2026-04-10
  • 基金资助:

    2021年贵州省教育科学规划课题:贵州省本科医学院校教师线上教学质量评估指标体系构建(2021B161)

Construction of an Online Teaching Quality Evaluation Index System of the Teachers in Medical Colleges and Universities Based on Delphi Method

  1. 1. School of Public Health, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 561113, China; 2. Hospital Management Office, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 561113, China; 3. Office of Teaching Quality Control, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 561113, China
  • Received:2025-09-22 Revised:2025-10-24 Online:2026-04-10 Published:2026-04-10

摘要:

 目的 构建省属医学院校教师线上教学质量评估指标体系,为省属医学院校教师线上教学质量评价提供参考依据。方法 以《贵州省高等学校教师教学质量评估指标体系》为基础,结合医学和线上教学特点以及文献资料拟定省属医学院校教师线上教学质量评估指标体系基本框架,采用德尔菲专家咨询法进行指标体系的修订与完善,采用优序法测算指标权重。结果 共有15名专家参与专家咨询,平均年龄(51.33±8.93)岁,从事教学质量保障相关工作年限15年及以上者占86.67%,高级职称14人,占93.33%。两轮专家咨询的专家积极系数分别为80%和100%;专家权威程度为0.91;第二轮指标体系重要性和可行性评价的肯德尔协调系数分别为 0.562χ2=343.931P<0.05)和 0.661χ2=404.737P<0.05)。最终确定省属医学院校教师线上教学质量评估指标体系包含4项一级指标、16项二级指标、52项三级指标。结论 构建的省属医学院校教师线上教学质量评估指标体系具有较好的可靠性和专家一致性,可为医学教育线上教学质量评价提供参考。

Abstract:

 Objective To establish an evaluation index system for the online teaching quality of teachers in provincial medical colleges and universities, and to provide a reference basis for the evaluation of the online teaching quality of teachers in provincial medical colleges and universities.Methods Based on the "Teaching Quality Evaluation Index System for Teachers in Higher Education Institutions of Guizhou Province", and in combination with the characteristics of medical and online teaching as well as literature materials, the basic framework of the online teaching quality evaluation index system for teachers in provincial medical colleges and universities was formulated. The Delphi expert consultation method was adopted to revise and improve the index system, and the order graph method was used to calculate the index weights.Results A total of 15 experts participated in the expert consultation, with an average age of (51.33±8.93) years. 86.67% of them had 15 years or more of experience in teaching quality guarantee-related work, and 14 of them held senior professional titles, accounting for 93.33%. The expert positive coefficients of the two rounds of expert consultations were 80% and 100% respectively, and the expert's authority level was 0.91. The Kendall coordination coefficient of expert importance and feasibility evaluation was 0.562 (χ2=343.931, P<0.05) and 0.661 (χ2=404.737, P<0.05). The final evaluation index system included 4 first-level indicators, 16 second-level indicators and 52 third-level indicators.Conclusion The constructed evaluation index system for the online teaching quality of teachers in provincial medical colleges and universities has good reliability and expert consistency, and can provide a reference for the evaluation of the online teaching quality of medical education.

中图分类号: