医学教育管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (3): 270-275.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2025.03.004

• 专题研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

医学院校临床教师教学综合能力评价体系的应用及意义 ——以首都医科大学为例

张巨1 , 鄢红春2 , 张世经2 , 杨硕3*   

  1. 1.首都医科大学燕京医学院,北京 101300; 2.首都医科大学电力教学医院科教科,北京 100073; 3.首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院眼科,北京 100020
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-19 出版日期:2025-06-20 发布日期:2025-07-25
  • 通讯作者: 杨硕 E-mail:yangshuo001@126.com

Application and significance of the comprehensive ability evaluation system for clinical teachers in medical collegestaking Capital Medical University as an example

Zhang Ju1, Yan Hongchun2, Zhang Shijing2, Yang Shuo3*   

  1. 1. Yanjing Medical College, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101300, China; 2. Science and Education Department, Electric Teaching Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100073, China; 3. Ophthalmology Department, Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2025-05-19 Online:2025-06-20 Published:2025-07-25

摘要: 作为医学教育的关键主体,临床教师的教学综合能力直接影响医学人才的培养质量。对临床教师教学能力进行科学系统评价,不仅是提高教学水平的重要途径,更是保障医学教育质量的核心环节。本研究应用首都医科大学研发的“临床教师教学综合能力评价系统”,收集了该校12所教学医院和21所临床医学院的教育教学课题指标数据,并将教学医院A和其他教学医院、临床医学院B与其他临床医学院及教学医院与临床医学院进行比较分析。为确保评价结果的科学性和可比性,本研究采用人均得分率作为量化指标,即各单位在教育教学课题指标上的总得分与其对应的教师总数的比值。结果表明,临床教师教学综合能力评价体系能有效激发临床教师在带教工作中的积极性和主动性,从而推动学校教学质量的持续改进与提高。

关键词: 医学院校, 临床教学, 临床教师, 教学质量, 评价体系

Abstract: As key stakeholders in medical education, the comprehensive teaching competence of clinical faculty directly influences the quality of medical talent cultivation. Conducting scientific and systematic evaluations of clinical faculty's teaching abilities is not only crucial for enhancing teaching standards but also a core component in ensuring the quality of medical education. This study applied the comprehensive teaching ability evaluation system for clinical teachers developed by Capital Medical University, collecting data on educational and teaching indicators from 12 teaching hospitals and 21 clinical medical colleges. The data were analyzed through comparative assessments between Teaching Hospital A and other teaching hospitals, Clinical Medical School B and other clinical medical schools, as well as between teaching hospitals and clinical medical schools collectively. To ensure the scientific comparability of evaluation results, this study adopted the per capita score rate as a quantitative indicator—that is, the ratio of the total scores achieved by each institution on educational and teaching indicators to its corresponding total number of faculty members. The data analysis results indicate that the implementation of the comprehensive teaching competence evaluation system for clinical faculty can effectively stimulate their enthusiasm and initiative in teaching practice, thereby driving continuous improvement and enhancement of teaching quality in medical institutions.

Key words:

medical college,  clinical teaching,  clinical instructor,  teaching quality,  quality evaluation system

中图分类号: