医学教育管理 ›› 2021, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (4): 441-444.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2021.04.018

• 师资队伍建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

预防医学专业课教师脱产培训意向及影响因素分析

漆光紫1,  何  琳1,  庞伟毅2   

  1. 1.右江民族医学院公共卫生与管理学院,百色 533000;2.桂林医学院公共卫生学院,桂林 541000
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-15 出版日期:2021-08-20 发布日期:2021-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 庞伟毅
  • 基金资助:
    2017年度广西高等教育教学改革工程项目:以公共卫生岗位胜任力为导向的“双师制”教学模式贯穿公共卫生与预防医学实践教学的研究(2017GJB339)

Analysis on preventive medicine teachers’ intention and influencing factors of receiving off-job training at practical teaching base

Qi Guangzi1,  He Lin1, Pang Weiyi2   

  1. 1.School of Public Health and Management, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise 533000, China; 2.School of public health of Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541000
  • Received:2020-10-15 Online:2021-08-20 Published:2021-09-02

摘要: 目的  探讨预防医学专业课教师脱产到实践教学基地学习的意向及影响因素。方法  2020年3月以在线网络调查的方式对广西2所高校的52名预防医学专业课教师进行问卷调查。结果  52名研究对象中,86.5%的人认为脱产到  中国疾病预防控制中心(Chinese Center for Disease Control and Preveation, CDC)学习有必要;75.0%的教师有意向到CDC脱产学习。对于脱产学习,研究对象考虑的问题排在前5位的分别是:脱产学习期限(86.5%),脱产学习能否提升专业知识和技能(73.1%),脱产学习对提高教学水平和质量是否有帮助(69.2%),学习的岗位工作内容与专业是否匹配(63.5%),CDC是否愿意接收并支持教师的学习(59.6%);大多数人认为脱产学习的时间期限安排为6个月比较合适。结论  大部分预防医学专业课教师期望能到实践教学基地进行脱产学习,同时教师们对脱产学习的时间期限、效用和制度保障等都非常关注。

关键词: 预防医学, 高校教师, 实践教学基地, 脱产学习, 影响因素

Abstract: Objective  To analyze preventive medicine teachers’ intention and influencing factors of receiving off-job training at practical teaching base.  Methods  In March 2020, an online questionnaire survey was conducted among 52 preventive medicine teachers from two universities in Guangxi.  Results  The 86.5% teachers in the survey thought it necessary to receive off-job training at CDC; 75.0% intended to receive off-job training at CDC. For off-job training, the top 5 questions considered are: 86.5% of people consider the period of off-job training, 73.1% of people consider whether they can improve their professional knowledge and skills, 69.2% of people consider whether they can improve their  teaching level and quality, 63.5% of people consider whether the content of off-job training matches their majors, and 59.6% consider whether CDC supports off-job training. Most people think that the six-month period of off-job training is most appropriate. Conclusion  Most preventive medicine teachers expect to receive off-job training at the practice teaching base. At the same time, teachers are concerned about the period, effectiveness, and system guarantees of off-job training. 

Key words: preventive medicine, university teachers, practical teaching base, off-job training, influencing factors

中图分类号: