文献阅读法在妇产科医学生临床科研思维培养中的探索

doi:10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2026.01.011

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

目的　探讨文献阅读法对妇产科医学生临床科研思维能力培养的影响。方法　选取2024年1—12月于首都医科大学附属复兴医院妇产科见习的60名临床医学（五年制）专业医学生作为研究对象，采用随机数字表法分为试验组（n=30）和对照组（n=30）。试验组接受为期8周的文献阅读训练，内容包括每周阅读1篇相关文献、参与小组讨论、撰写总结报告，并在教师指导下分析科研方法与数据，完成幻灯片展示；对照组则按照常规教学模式学习。干预结束后，对两组学生进行科研能力问卷调查，并开展科研论文分析测试，以评估其科研思维能力。结果　试验组学生的科研基础知识、实验设计与方法选择能力及文献检索与阅读能力优于对照组（P＜0.05），在试验组学生的研究内容理解、批判性分析及实际应用与思考优于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论　文献阅读法在提升医学生科研思维能力方面具有积极作用，尤其在批判性思维、科研设计能力和科研论文解读能力方面效果显著。

关键词:

, 文献阅读法｜科研思维能力｜医学教育｜定量研究｜批判性思维

Abstract:

Objective　To explore the effect of literature reading method in the cultivation of clinical research thinking ability of medical students in obstetrics and gynecology.Methods　A total of 60 clinical medicine undergraduates who completed their obstetrics and gynecology clerkship at Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2024 to December 2024 were recruited as research subjects. They were randomly divided into an experimental group (n=30) and a control group (n=30), by a random number lable method. The experimental group received literature reading training for 8 weeks, including reading one relevant research paper per week, participating in group discussion, writing summary reports, analyzing research methods and data, and delivering PowerPoint presentations under the guidance of the teacher. The control group followed the conventional teaching mode. After the intervention, all students were administered a questionnaire survey on research capabilities and a research paper analysis test to evaluate their clinical and research thinking competence.Results　After the study, the results of the research capability questionnaire indicated that the experimental group outperformed the control group in terms of basic research knowledge, experimental design and methodology selection, as well as literature retrieval and reading skills (P＜0.05). In the research paper analysis test, the experimental group demonstrated better performance than the control group in research content comprehension, critical analysis, and practical application and reflection (P＜0.05). Conclusions　The literature reading method exerts a positive effect on improving medical students' clinical and research thinking competence, with particularly significant outcomes in critical thinking, research design capability and scientific paper interpretation competence.

Key words:

, literature reading method｜scientific thinking ability｜medical education｜quantitative research｜critical thinking

中图分类号:

R71
G642

杨雪, 黄晓武, 宋冬梅, 张馨, 霍静.

文献阅读法在妇产科医学生临床科研思维培养中的探索 [J]. 医学教育管理, 2026, 12(1): 66-70.

Yang Xue, Huang Xiaowu, Song Dongmei, Zhang Xin, Huo Jing.

Exploration of literature reading method in training clinical scientific research thinking of medical students in obstetrics and gynecology [J]. Medical Education Management, 2026, 12(1): 66-70.

参考文献

［1］吕哲昊，韩巍，教玉颖，等. 基于线上文献学习活动提高核医学科住院医师规范化培训质量的探索［J］.中国毕业后医学教育， 2022， 6（4）： 335-338．

［2］于贺娟，齐晓艳，王淑丽. 文献阅读在内科住院医师规范化培训中的应用［J］. 河南医学高等专科学校学报， 2024， 36（2）：284-287.

［3］ Wang J， Xu X， Shi X， et al. Literature-based learning and experimental design model in molecular biology teaching for medical students at Tongji University［J］. Biochem Mol Biol Educ. 2021， 49（2）：189-197.

［4］ Clauss J A， Cawkwell P B， Beach S R. Refreshing a resident-run journal club： a focus on article selection［J］. Acad Psychiatry， 2019， 43（6）： 657-658.

［5］ Shrivastava S R， Shrivastava P S. Promoting the conduct of medical education journal clubs in teaching medical institutions［J］. Avicenna J Med， 2021， 11（3）：156-159.

［6］ Ballouk R， Mansour V， Dalziel B， et al. The development and validation of a questionnaire to explore medical students' learning in a blended learning environment［J］. BMC Med Educ， 2022， 22（1）：4.

［7］ Saunders H， Gallagher-Ford L， Kvist T， et al. Practicing healthcare professionals’ evidence-based practice competencies：an overview of systematic reviews［J］. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs， 2019， 16（3）：176-185.

［8］高娟，左常艳，黄文娅，等. 读书笔记与病例汇报在口腔住院医师规范化培训中的应用［J］. 中国继续医学教育， 2022， 14（6）：101-105．

［9］ Fu D Q， Huang Y Q， Que Y H， et al. Factors affecting the scientific research ability and the corresponding countermeasures in clinical postgraduates［J］. BMC Med Educ， 2023， 23（1）：309.

［10］Ahmed Y， Taha M H， Khayal S. Integrating research and teaching in medical education： challenges， strategies， and implications for healthcare［J］. J Adv Med Educ Prof， 2024，12（1）：1-7.

［11］Miller E， Weightman M J， Basu A， et al. The importance of appraising articles and conducting psychiatric journal clubs［J］. Australas Psychiatry， 2023， 31（6）：725-729.

［12］Thakkar V J，Toups M，dela Cruz A M. Skills acquisition and engagement with the use of a structured journal club curriculum［J］. Acad Psychiatry， 2025， 49（2）：147-151

［13］张伟，祁俊侠，杨茜璐，等. 基于文献阅读和科研设计培养医学本科生的科研素养［J］. 基础医学教育， 2023， 25（ 3）： 261-265．

［14］ Araújo B， Gomes S F， Ribeiro L. Critical thinking pedagogical practices in medical education： a systematic review［J］. Front Med， 2024；11：1358444.

［15］张银昌，林家婷. CBL教学法结合文献汇报在骨科规范化培训中的应用［J］．皖南医学院学报， 2019， 38（5）： 493-495．

［16］Xie W， Li Y， Liu X. Application of problem-based learning and case-based learning in teaching ectopic pregnancy to fifth-year medical students［J］. BMC Med Educ， 2024， 24（1）： 1346.

[1]	佀思聪, 李静, 杨伟, 魏占云, 孙璟皓, 吕龙峰. 人工智能工具在医学研究生科学研究中的使用现状及应用探索 [J]. 医学教育管理, 2026, 12(1): 99-107.
[2]	汤辉. “互联网+”背景下标准化病人联合问题指导教学对脓毒症临床教学的效果 [J]. 医学教育管理, 2026, 12(1): 72-77.
[3]	王娜, 余焕玲. 社区学院实施社区营养教育路径探究 [J]. 医学教育管理, 2026, 12(1): 108-114.
[4]	韩雪, 郭瑱. 医学院校“模拟政协”融入习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想概论课“三维”教学改革探索 [J]. 医学教育管理, 2026, 12(1): 7-14.