医学教育管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1): 72-77.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2026.01.012

• 临床教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

“互联网+”背景下标准化病人联合问题指导教学对脓毒症临床教学的效果

  

  1. 首都医科大学宣武医院急诊内科,北京 100053
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-28 修回日期:2025-05-23 出版日期:2026-02-20 发布日期:2026-03-20

Effectiveness of standardized patient combined with problem-based instruction under the "Internet+" model in clinical teaching of sepsis#br#
#br#

  1. Emergency Internal Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2025-04-28 Revised:2025-05-23 Online:2026-02-20 Published:2026-03-20

摘要:

目的 探究“互联网+”背景下标准化病人联合问题指导教学对脓毒症临床教学的效果。方法 选取20222023年在首都医科大学宣武医院接受脓毒症教学授课的64名临床医学(“5+3”一体化)专业本科生为研究对象,根据教学方式不同分为试验组(n=32)和对照组(n=32)。试验组采用“互联网+”背景下标准化病人联合问题指导教学法,对照组则采用传统教学法。比较两组学生的脓毒症知识掌握情况、临床思维能力、决策准确性、团队协作能力、教学病例讨论质量及教学满意度。结果 试验组学生在脓毒症知识掌握情况[(29.28±4.25)分]、临床思维能力[(28.95±4.62)分]、决策准确性[(27.82±3.78)分]、团队协作能力[(18.95±2.68)分]方面均显著优于对照组[(26.16±3.89)分、(25.76±3.25)分、(25.16±2.89)分、(16.75±2.35)分],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);试验组学生在为人师表[(4.69±0.27)分]、内容选择[(9.14±1.21)分]、目标计划[(14.96±2.65)分]、引导思维[(18.79±3.15)分]、教学互动[(19.02±3.13)分]、临床指导[(19.12±3.21)分]及归纳启发[(9.25±1.34)分]教学质量上均显著优于对照组[(4.52±0.22)分、(7.98±0.98)分、(13.12±2.31)分、(16.12±2.32)分、(16.35±2.56)分、(15.72±2.32)分、(7.98±1.01)分](P<0.05);试验组学生的教学满意度显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 “互联网+”背景下标准化病人联合问题指导教学可有效提升学生脓毒症知识掌握情况、临床思维能力、决策准确性、团队协作能力,教学质量及满意度更高,值得在脓毒症临床教学中借鉴和参考。

关键词:

 , “互联网+”|标准化病人|问题指导教学|脓毒症|临床教学|教学效果

Abstract:

 Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of standardized patient (SP) combined with problem-based instruction under the "Internet+" model in the clinical teaching of sepsis.Methods A total of 64 undergraduates enrolled in a "5+3" integrated program at Xuanwu Hospital were recruited and randomly assigned to either the experimental group (n=32) or the control group (n=32), based on different teaching approaches. The experimental group received SP-based, problem-guided instruction supported by internet technologies, while the control group received traditional instruction. Outcomes including knowledge acquisition, clinical reasoning, decision-making accuracy, teamwork ability, case discussion quality, and teaching satisfaction were compared.Results The students in the experimental group had significantly better knowledge mastery of sepsis [(29.28±4.25) points], clinical thinking ability [(28.95±4.62) points], decision-making accuracy [(27.82±3.78) points], teamwork ability [(18.95±2.68) points] compared with the control group [(26.16±3.89) points, (25.76±3.25) points, (25.16±2.89) points, (16.75±2.35) points and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); The students in the experimental group had significantly better teaching quality in terms of role model [(4.69±0.27) points], content selection [(9.14±1.21) points], goal planning [(14.96±2.65) points] guiding thinking [(18.79±3.15) points], teaching interaction [(19.02±3.13) points], clinical guidance [(19.12±3.21) points] and induction and inspiration [(9.25±1.34) points] compared with the control group [(4.52±0.22) points, (7.98±0.98) points, (13.12±2.31) points, (16.12±2.32) points, (16.35±2.56) points, (15.72±2.32) points, (7.98±1.01) points], and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); The teaching satisfaction of the students in the experimental group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05).Conclusion The SP combined with problem-based instruction under the "internet+" model effectively improves students' mastery of sepsis-related knowledge, clinical thinking, decision-making, and teamwork. It also enhances teaching quality and satisfaction, making it a valuable approach in clinical education on sepsis.

Key words:  , Internet+|standardized patient|problem-based instruction|sepsis|clinical teaching|teaching effectiveness

中图分类号: