医学教育管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 216-221.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2025.02.016

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

医科院校附属医院教研室教学评价指标体系的构建

杨丽娟1 , 肖晶1 , 王悦1 , 刘薇薇2*   

  1. 1.大连医科大学医学教育研究所,大连 116044; 2.大连医科大学图书馆,大连 116044
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-30 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-05-27
  • 通讯作者: 刘薇薇 E-mail:17642943@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    1.中国高等教育学会2024年度高等教育科学研究规划课题项目(24PG0302);2.2024年辽宁省教育科学研究基地专项课题项目(JG24JDB21);3.辽宁省教育科学“十三五”规划2020年度立项重点课题项目(JG20DA006)

Construction of evaluation index system for teaching research offices in affiliated hospitals of medical universities

Yang Lijuan1, Xiao Jing1, WangYue 1, Liu Weiwei2*   

  1. 1. Institute of Medical Education, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China; 2. Library, Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116044, China
  • Received:2024-12-30 Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-05-27

摘要: 目的 为保证对医科院校附属医院各临床学科教研室教学管理工作进行科学、可量化的评价,构建《医科院校附属医院教研室教学评价指标体系》。方法 在文献研究和实地调研基础上,初步形成《医科院校附属医院教研室教学评价指标体系》(征询意见稿),对其评价指标构成和赋分权重采用德尔菲法进行3轮专家意见征询。结果 最终确定包含6个一级指标和25个二级指标以及1个附加项目指标的《医科院校附属医院教研室教学评价指标体系》,3轮咨询专家权威系数(Cr)分别为0.842、0.869和0.857,各项指标的变异系数(CV)为0.12~0.18,征询专家的积极程度、权威程度和协调程度均比较好。结论 本研究指标体系具有较好的实践可操作性和普遍推广应用性。

关键词: 医科院校, 临床学科教研室, 教学管理, 指标体系

Abstract: Objective To establish a scientific and quantifiable evaluation framework for the teaching management of teaching and research departments in clinical disciplines at medical college-affiliated hospitals, and to develop the Teaching Evaluation Index System for these departments. Methods  Based on literature review and field investigations, an initial version of the Evaluation Index System for Teaching and Research Departments of Medical College-Affiliated Hospitals (consultation draft) was formulated. Subsequently, three rounds of expert consultations were conducted using the Delphi method to refine the composition of the evaluation indices and the allocation of weights. Results  The final "Teaching Evaluation Index System for Teaching and Research Departments of Medical College-Affiliated Hospitals" was established, comprising 6 first-level indicators, 25 second-level indicators, and 1 additional item index. Statistical analysis revealed that the authority coefficient (Cr) for the three rounds of expert consultations was 0.842, 0.869, and 0.857, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CV) for each index ranged between 0.12 and 0.18, indicating relatively low variability. Additionally, the positive response rate, authority level, and coordination among experts were satisfactory.Conclusion  Practical testing demonstrated that this index system exhibits strong operational feasibility and broad applicability, providing a valuable reference for teaching evaluation and management in medical university-affiliated hospitals.

Key words:

medical universities, clinical disciplinary teaching and research departments, teaching management, index system

中图分类号: