医学教育管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (6): 682-685,691.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096- 045X.2022.06.008

• 课程思政 • 上一篇    下一篇

新冠肺炎疫情背景下医学院校师资课程思政能力培训方式探索

张  维1，  王亚军1，    卢  洁1，   陈  超1，  朱庆双1，  朱  淼2，    武  艳2   

  1. 1.首都医科大学宣武医院教育处，北京100053;2.首都医科大学教务处，北京 100069
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-04 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2023-01-09
  • 通讯作者: 王亚军
  • 基金资助:
    北京市教育工委高等教育本科教学改革创新项目：立德树人——临床医学专业“课程思政”教学改革探索

Training methods of teachers' ideological and political ability in medical colleges during the COVID-19 pandemic

Zhang Wei1, Wang Yajun1, Lu Jie1, Chen Chao1, Zhu Qingshuang1, Zhu Miao2, Wu Yan2   

  1. 1.Educational Affairs Office, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China; 2.Academic Affairs Office, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100069, China
  • Received:2022-07-04 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2023-01-09

PDF

60

摘要： 目的  探索新冠肺炎疫情背景下有效开展医学院校师资课程思政能力培训的方式。方法  选取首都医科大学各临床医学院的73名临床骨干师资为研究对象，采用对照法比较培训效果，线下培训组41人，线上培训组32人，培训后统一进行考核，包括理论考核和提交课程思政教学案例两部分。结果  两组间男女比例、平均年龄、临床教学年限差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），具有可比性；学习效果评价方面，两组间理论考核成绩和课程思政教学案例得分均差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），但课程思政教学案例提交率线下组（92.68%）高于线上组（75.00%），差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。教学质量评价方面，两组间对课程思政教育理念、教学能力及示范课教学评价均无显著性差异（P>0.05），但理论授课环节线上培训组非常满意率（96.88%）显著高于线下培训组（78.05%），差异具有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论  在新冠肺炎疫情背景下，师资课程思政能力培训采用线上或线下方式效果相当，但各有优势，因此可根据课程内容，采取“线上+线下”混合教学培训方式。

关键词: 新冠肺炎疫情, 医学院校, 课程思政, 培训方式, 效果

Abstract: Objective  To explore effective ways to carry out ideological and political ability training of medical college teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods  A total of 73 clinical teachers from the clinical medical schools of Capital Medical University were selected as the subjects, 41 in offline training group and 32 in online training group. They were assessed in a unified way including theoretical assessment and submission of ideological and political theory education cases. Results  There was no significant difference in male to female ratio, average age and clinical teaching years between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of learning effect evaluation, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the scores of theoretical assessment and the scores of ideological and political theory education cases (P>0.05), but the submission rate of ideological and political theory education cases in the offline group (92.68%) was higher than that in the online group (75.00%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In terms of teaching quality evaluation, there was no significant difference between the two groups in aspects of ideological and political theory education concept, teaching ability and teaching evaluation of demonstration courses (P>0.05), but the very satisfactory rate of online training group in theoretical teaching link (96.88%) was significantly higher than that of offline training group (78.05%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion  During the COVID-19 pandemic, the online and offline training of teachers' ideological and political ability has achieved the same effect, yet each has its own advantages. Therefore, the “online and offline” mixed training method might be adopted according to the course content.

Key words: COVID-19 pandemic, medical colleges, ideological and political education, training methods, effect

中图分类号: 

版权所有 © 《医学教育管理》编辑部
地址：北京市丰台区右安门外西头条10号首都医科大学内　邮编：100069
电话：010-83911607 010-83911608　 Email：mem@ccmu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发　技术支持：support@magtech.com.cn