医学教育管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (5): 591-597.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2025.05.015

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床教师数字素养现状调查及影响因素分析——基于首都医科大学13所临床医学院的实证研究

张维,  刚婷婷,  王亚军*,  陈超,  卢洁   

  1. 首都医科大学宣武医院教育处,北京 100053
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-12 修回日期:2025-03-17 出版日期:2025-10-20 发布日期:2025-11-07
  • 通讯作者: 王亚军 E-mail:wangyajun@xwhosp.org
  • 基金资助:
    教育部产学研协同育人项目:数字化医学师资培训中心建设

Investigation on the current situation of digital literacy of clinical teachers and analysis of influencing factors—an empirical study based on 13 clinical medical colleges of Capital Medical University

Zhang Wei, Gang Tingting, Wang Yajun*, Chen Chao, Lu Jie   

  1. Education Department, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2025-03-12 Revised:2025-03-17 Online:2025-10-20 Published:2025-11-07

摘要: 目的 评估临床教师数字素养现状,剖析其影响因素,并提出针对性提升策略,以响应《教师数字素养》行业标准要求,推动医学教育数字化转型。方法 根据教育部《教师数字素养》行业标准要求,结合相关文献、专家咨询和教师座谈,设计调查问卷,2024年3月对首都医科大学13所临床医学院的140名临床教师进行问卷调查,采用独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析对结果进行统计分析。结果 临床教师数字素养各维度评分间差异有统计学意义(F=21.88,P=0.001),评分最高的是数字社会责任[(4.70±0.45)分],其次是数字化意识[(4.52±0.46)分],数字技术知识与技能[(4.13±0.75)分]和数字化应用[(4.17±0.69)分]得分较低。不同性别临床教师在数字技术知识与技能(t=2.55,P=0.012)以及数字化协同育人(t=2.23,P=0.028)维度差异有统计学意义。子维度数字技术知识(t =2.15,P =0.033)、数字技术技能(t=2.53,P=0.013)差异均有统计学意义。不同年龄组临床教师在数字技术知识维度(F=3.53,P=0.032)差异有统计学意义。结论 临床教师数字素养各维度发展不均衡,数字技术知识与技能和数字化应用能力仍需系统性提升;不同性别、年龄数字素养能力程度不一,实施分层培训、指导为佳。

关键词: 教育数字化, 临床教师, 数字化素养, 现状调查, 提升策略

Abstract: Objective To assess the current status of digital literacy among clinical teachers, analyze its influencing factors, and propose targeted improvement strategies in response to the requirements of the Digital Literacy for Teachers standard, thereby promoting the digital transformation of medical education.Methods Based on the Digital Literacy for Teachers industry standard issued by the Ministry of Education, a questionnaire was designed by integrating relevant literature, expert consultations, and teacher discussions. In March 2024, a survey was conducted among 140 clinical teachers from 13 clinical medical schools of Capital Medical University. The data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and One-Way ANOVA.Results Significant differences were observed in the scores across various dimensions of clinical teachers' digital literacy (F=21.88, P<0.001). The highest score was in digital social responsibility (4.70±0.45) points, followed by digital awareness (4.52±0.46) points, while digital technology knowledge and skills (4.13±0.75) points and digital application scored relatively lower (4.17±0.69) points. Significant gender differences were found in digital technology knowledge and skills (t=2.55, P=0.012) and digital collaborative education (t=2.23, P=0.028). Sub-dimensions such as digital technology knowledge (t=2.15, P=0.033) and digital technology skills (t=2.53, P=0.013) also showed significant differences. Age-related differences were observed in the dimension of digital technology knowledge (F=3.53, P=0.032).Conclusion The development of clinical teachers' digital literacy is uneven across dimensions, with digital technology knowledge and skills as well as digital application capabilities requiring systematic improvement. Differences in digital literacy levels based on gender and age suggest that stratified training and guidance would be beneficial.

Key words: digitalization of education, clinical teacher, digital literacy, current situation, enhancement strategies

中图分类号: