医学教育管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 301-307,318.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2022.03.010

• 师资队伍建设 • 上一篇    下一篇

临床教师教育教学业绩评价体系的构建与应用

谢千池1,  武  艳1,  雷丽萍2,  路孝琴3,  吴  萍1,  朱  淼1,  郭  蕊1,  王  岩1,  付  斌1,  赵  颖1,  王松灵4,5
  

  1. 1.首都医科大学教务处,北京 100069;2.首都医科大学人事处,北京 100069;3.首都医科大学全科医学与继续教育学院,北京 100069;4.首都医科大学,北京 100069;5.首都医科大学口腔健康北京实验室,北京 100069
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-14 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-12
  • 通讯作者: 王松灵
  • 基金资助:
    北京市教育科学“十三五”规划立项课题(CDDB19164)

Construction and application of teaching performance evaluation system for clinical teacher education

Xie Qianchi1,  Wu Yan1,  Lei Liping2,  Lu Xiaoqin3,  Wu Ping1,  Zhu Miao1,  Guo Rui1,  Wang Yan1,  Fu Bin1,  Zhao Ying1,  Wang Songling4, 5   

  1. 1. Academic Affairs Office,  Capital Medical University,  Beijing 100069,  China; 2. Department of Human Resource,  Capital Medical University,  Beijing 100069,  China; 3. School of General Practice and Continuing Education,  Capital Medical University,  Beijing 100069,  China; 4. Capital Medical University,Beijing 100069,  China; 5. Beijing Laboratory  of  Oral  Health, Beijing 100069,  China
  • Received:2022-03-14 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-12

摘要: 为贯彻落实中共中央、国务院印发的《深化新时代教育评价改革总体方案》,完善立德树人体制机制,改革临床教师评价标准,践行教书育人使命,首都医科大学根据临床教师的教学工作内容及特点,制定了临床教师教育教学业绩评价体系,并率先付诸实践。旨在对教师的教学综合能力开展量化的、科学的分类评价。2020年11月-2021年1月,学校首次对各临床医学院、教学医院(共计34家教学单位)的7 680名临床教师开展了教学综合能力的评价工作。通过系统的评价与分析,确定了教学型教授与教学型副教授教学综合能力平均水平分数线,为2021年11月评聘教学型临床教师职称提供了重要的参考依据。这项研究为我国新时代临床教师教育评价改革提供了实践经验和新的思路。

关键词: 临床教师, 教学综合能力, 评价, 教育教学业绩, 教学型教授

Abstract: In order to implement the State Council’s “Overall Plan for Deepening Educational Evaluation Reform in the New Era”,  to improve the system and mechanisms of moral education and cultivation,  to reform evaluation standard for evaluating clinical teachers’ teaching ability,  and to promote the implementation of the mission of imparting knowledge and education,  we established and took the lead in practicing a teaching performance evaluation system for clinical teachers according to their teaching content and characteristics at Capital Medical University. The aim of our comprehensive teaching ability evaluation index system is to carry out quantitative and scientific classification of comprehensive teaching ability evaluation. From November 2020 to January 2021,  we performed the first-time comprehensive teaching ability evaluation for a total of 7, 680 clinical teachers from 34 teaching units including various clinical medical schools and clinical teaching hospitals. Through systematic evaluation and analysis,  we confirmed the average score of comprehensive teaching ability for teaching professors and associate professors. This work provides an important reference for the evaluation of teaching-oriented clinical teachers,  which was used to determine their suitability for promotion at our university in November 2021. This study provides new ideas for educational evaluation reform based on practical experience for the current generation of clinical teachers in China.

Key words: clinical teachers, comprehensive teaching ability, evaluation, educational and teaching achievements, teaching professor1

中图分类号: