医学教育管理 ›› 2018, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (6): 515-519.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2018.06.016 ·

• 临床教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

PBL联合LBL在血管外科临床见习教学中的价值分析

廖传军,张望德   

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院血管外科,北京 100020
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-28 出版日期:2018-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 张望德

Effect of PBL+LBL in clinical practice teaching of vascular surgery

Liao Chuanjun, Zhang Wangde   

  1. Department of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020,China
  • Received:2018-08-28 Online:2018-12-20

摘要: 目的 探讨基于问题的教学(problem-based learning,PBL) 结合以授课为基础的教学 (lecturebased learning,LBL) 在血管外科见习教学中的应用效果。方法 将2013 年- 2017 年在北京朝阳医院血管外科见习的首都医科大学学生共110 名分为两组,每组各55 人,实验组采取PBL 联合LBL 的教学模式,对照组采取传统的LBL 教学模式,对教学的效果进行客观和主观评价。结果 实验组专业理论知识成绩与临床操作技能成绩明显优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。学习效果满意度的调查问卷的结果实验组满意度均高于对照组,两组之间的差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 在血管外科临床见习中采取PBL 和LBL结合的教学模式能有效提高学生的专业理论知识成绩、临床操作技能成绩以及学生的学习满意度,有效提升了教学水平。

Abstract: Objective To study and analyze the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL)in clinical practice teaching of vascular surgery. Methods From 2013 to 2017, PBL+LBL teaching mode was applied in vascular surgery clinical practice teaching for the experimental group of 55 students of Capital Medical University,and traditional LBL teaching was applied to the control group of another 55 students. Professional theory knowledge,clinical skills and questionnaires of two groups were analyzed. Results Professional theory knowledge, clinical skills and questionnaire showed that the scores in PBL+LBL group were significantly higher than those in the LBL group.Conclusion PBL+LBL is superior to LBL in vascular surgery clinical practice teaching.