医学教育管理 ›› 2019, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (1): 22-24,33.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2019.01.006

• 临床教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

武汉大学医学院课程教学模式改革儿科学教学效果比较研究

甘雨茹1, 邓幼平1, 范静怡2, 赵东赤1, 雷 红2 ,李金芯3, 方丽辉1   

  1. 1. 武汉大学中南医院儿科、武汉大学第二临床学院儿科教研室,武汉 430071;2. 武汉大学第二临床学院教学办公室,武汉 430071;3. 武汉大学医学部教学管理处,武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2018-09-18 出版日期:2019-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 邓幼平
  • 基金资助:
    武汉大学第二临床学院教学研究立项基金资助项目(2015012)

Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of pediatrics course teaching reform in Wuhan University Medical School

Gan Yuru1, Deng Youping1, Fan Jingyi2, Zhao Dongchi1, Lei Hong2, Li Jinxin3, Fang Lihui1   

  1. 1. Department of Pediatrics, ZhongNan Hospital of Wuhan University; Department of Pediatrics, Second Clinical College of Wuhan University, WuHan 430071,China; 2. Teaching Office of the Second Clinical College of Wuhan University, WuHan 430071, China; 3. Teaching Management Office of Wuhan University Medicine school, WuHan 430071, China
  • Received:2018-09-18 Online:2019-02-20
  • Contact: Deng Youping

摘要: 目的 通过对武汉大学医学生实施新型的儿科理论课和床边教学方法,初步探讨此教学课程改革的成效。方法 以2010 级、2011 级、2012 级临床医学专业五年制学生作为研究对象,分为普通班328 名和实验班68 名。普通班仍然采取传统教学方法教学, 实验班采取以临床病理生理和治疗学(clinicalpathophysiology and therapy,CPPT) 为核心的武汉大学医学教育改革(WuHan University MedicalEducation Reform,WUMER)教改模式,对两个班的教学效果进行对比分析。结果 随着教学改革的推进,普通班与实验班之间的理论和技能成绩差异减小,但各年级之间的理论、技能和病例分析3 个成绩的差异均具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 从教学内容、教学方法及考核方式3 个方面进行分析,儿科学课程教学改革有效,能够提高有效学生的临床思维及实践能力。

Abstract: Objective To explore the effectiveness of this teaching curriculum reform by implementing a new pediatric theory class and bedside teaching method for medical students in Wuhan University. Methods Five-year students of 2010,2011 and 2012 clinical medicine majors were selected as subjects and were divided into the control class (328) and the experimental class (68). The control class is taught by the traditional teaching method, and the experimental class adopts the WUMER teaching reform mode with CPPT as the core to compare and analyze the teaching effects of the two classes.Results With the advancement of teaching reform, the differences in theoretical scores and skill scores between control class and experimental class in each grade were narrowed, but the differences in theories, skills, and case analysis between two classes were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion From three aspects of teaching content, teaching methods and assessment methods, result of the teaching reform of the pediatric curriculum has achieved, which can improve students’ clinical thinking and practical ability.