医学教育管理 ›› 2022, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (3): 354-360.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2022.03.019

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

风险防范背景下精神障碍患者强制医疗解除的相关问题研究——以社区精防医生认知调查为依据

王昊旻,  李筱永   

  1. 首都医科大学医学人文学院,北京  100069
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-17 出版日期:2022-06-20 发布日期:2022-06-13
  • 通讯作者: 李筱永
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金项目:我国精神病人强制医疗的实证研究(17BFX060)

Ending compulsory medical treatment of patients with mental disorders under the background of risk prevention—based on the cognition survey of community prevention psychiatrists

Wang Haomin,  Li Xiaoyong   

  1. School of Medical Humanities,  Capital Medical University,  Beijing 100069,  China
  • Received:2021-09-17 Online:2022-06-20 Published:2022-06-13
  • Supported by:

摘要: 目的  了解风险防范背景下精神障碍患者强制医疗解除制度中存在的问题,以期提供相应完善建议。方法  课题组对于随机抽取北京市4个区的社区卫生服务中心的精防医生进行了问卷调查,对于数据采用SPSS 25.0统计软件进行多重响应分析及χ2拟合优度检验。结果  214位医生中,136(63.6%)位医生认为应当由安康医院提出解除强制医疗的申请,仅有9(4.2%)位医生认为应该由患者自己提出。对于强制医疗解除的决定主体,选择安康医院和司法鉴定机构的医生均为73(34.1%)位,而选择法院的仅为18(8.4%)位。对于刑事强制医疗“解除难”的原因进行比较,结果具有统计学意义(χ2=12.243,P=0.016)。选择“解除标准不合理”的医生最多达到了151(70.6%)位。对于患者居家管理问题,88(41.1%)位医生选择“卫生部门与公安部门互相配合”。对于刑事强制医疗解除与社区管理衔接问题差异进行比较,结果不具有统计学意义(χ2=2.103,P=0.551)。结论  刑事强制医疗解除申请主体、解除标准、审理模式、与社区管理的衔接相关规定存在不合理问题。建议应当完善定期评估制度,弥合医学和法学标准之间的裂痕,综合评价解除标准;细化强制医疗解除的开庭审理程序;将患者管理纳入社区康复体系,通过社区康复体系缓解刑事强制医疗“解除难”的问题,以保障患者有效治疗及回归社会。

关键词: 刑事强制医疗解除, 风险防范, 解除程序, 社区康复体系

Abstract: Objective  To understand the problems existing in ending of the compulsory medical treatment system of mentally disabled patients under the background of risk prevention,  and to provide corresponding improvement suggestions.  Methods  We conducted a questionnaire survey among psychiatrists randomly selected from community health service centers in  four districts in Beijing. Multiple response analysis and Chi-square goodness-of-fit test were performed using SPSS 25.0. Results   A total of 136 (63.6%) of the psychiatrists believed that the Ankang Hospital should apply for the ending compulsory medical treatment,  and only 9 (4.2%) of them thought that the patients should apply by themselves. For the decision subject of ending compulsory medical treatment,  psychiatrists who chose Ankang Hospital and Judicial Accreditation Agency are both 73 (34.1%),  while only 18 (8.4%) chose the court. Comparison of the reasons why “the criminal compulsory medical treatment is difficult to end” were statistically different (χ2=12.243,  P=0.016). Psychiatrists who chose “unreasonable standards” reached up to 151 (70.6%). For patients' home management problems,  88 (41.1%) of the psychiatrists chose “health departments and public security departments cooperate with each other”. The proportions of psychiatrists choosing different problems existing in “connecting between ending of criminal compulsory medical treatment and community management” were not statistically different (χ2=2.103,  P=0.551). Conclusion  The implementation of ending of the compulsory medical treatment system concerning the entities of application,  release standard,  trial mode and connection with community management has imperfections. It is advisable to improve the regular evaluation system,  to make up for the cracks between medical and legal standards,  and to complete the comprehensive evaluation release standard. We should refine the opening trial procedure of compulsory medical treatment release and include patients into the scope of community rehabilitation system. The problem of “the compulsory medical treatment is hard to end” can be solved by community rehabilitation system,  and the patients can get effective treatment and return to society.

Key words: ending compulsory medical treatment, risk prevention, procedures of termination, community rehabilitation system

中图分类号: