医学教育管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6): 701-706.doi: 10. 3969/j. issn. 2096-045X. 2025. 06. 013

• 住院医师培训 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同学历住院医师掌握甲状腺影像报告和数据系统的学习曲线分析

钟敏莹, 袁莹萍 ,熊玥 ,甄朝炯 ,黄伟俊*


  

  1. 佛山市第一人民医院超声诊疗中心,佛山 528000
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-01 修回日期:2025-05-19 出版日期:2025-12-20 发布日期:2026-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 黄伟俊 E-mail:zmy2780@163.com
  • 基金资助:

    1.广东省医学科学技术研究项目(A2023502);2.广东省基础与应用基础研究项目(2023A1515220135)

Learning curve for residents with different educational backgrounds in masteringthyroid imaging reporting and data system

Zhong Minying, Yuan Yingping, Xiong Yue, Zhen Chaojiong, Huang Weijun*   

  1. Zhong Minying, Yuan Yingping, Xiong Yue, Zhen Chaojiong, Huang Weijun
  • Received:2025-04-01 Revised:2025-05-19 Online:2025-12-20 Published:2026-01-15

摘要: 目的 探讨不同学历的一年级住院医师掌握2017年美国放射学会(American College of Radiology,ACR)甲状腺影像报告和数据系统(Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System,TI-RADS)的学习曲线。方法 选择 2023年 1月至2025年1月期间在佛山市第一人民医院超声诊疗中心参加住院医师规范化培训的21名一年级住院医师进行教学研究,根据住院医师的学历分成研究生组 8名和本科组 13名。参加 ACR TI-RADS培训后,将 125个甲状腺病例随机分成5组,每组25个病例,分5次分发给住院医师考核。以高年资医师的TI-RADS分类为参考标准,对比每名住院医师读图后的 TI-RADS分类结果,与高年资医生结果一致得 4分,不一致得 0分,同时记录答题时间,并绘制学习曲线图。结果 两组住院医师各阶段考核分数均呈上升趋势,差异有统计学意义(F=14. 690,P<0. 001),其中研究生学历住院医师从第 2 次开始明显增高,后趋于平稳;5 次考核得分的组间比较,差异无统计学意义(F=3. 158,P=0. 092)。结论一年级住院医师经过理论培训和50例甲状腺结节的读片后,可基本掌握ACR TI-RADS分类并趋于稳定,研究生学历住院医师掌握程度更优.

Abstract: Objective To explore the learning curve of first-year residents with different educational backgrounds inmastering the 2017 American College of Radiology (ACR) Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS).Methods A total of 21 first -year residents who participated in standardized training for residents at Ultrasound Center ofFoshan First People's Hospital from 2023 to 2025 were selected. They were divided into a postgraduate group (8 residents)and an undergraduate group (13 residents) based on their educational backgrounds. After receiving training on ACR TIRADS, 125 thyroid cases were randomly divided into 5 groups with 25 cases each, which were distributed to the residentsfor assessment in 5 separate sessions. Taking the TI-RADS classification results of senior physicians as the referencestandard, each resident's classification results were compared with those of senior physicians: 4 points were awarded forconsistency and 0 points for inconsistency. Meanwhile, the time spent on each assessment was recorded, and learning curveswere plotted. Results The assessment scores of both groups showed an upward trend at all stages, with a statistically significant difference (F=14. 690, P<0. 001). The scores of the postgraduate group increased significantly from the secondassessment and then stabilized. There was no statistically significant difference in the scores between the two groups acrossthe 5 assessments (F=3. 158, P=0. 092). Conclusion After theoretical training and reading 50 thyroid nodule cases, firstyear residents can basically master ACR TI-RADS classification and achieve stable performance, with postgraduate residentsdemonstrating better mastery.

中图分类号: