医学教育管理 ›› 2026, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (4): 525-531.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2026.04.014

• 临床教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

改良BOPPPS教学模式结合案例模拟教学在麻醉危机管理培训中的应用

  

  1. 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院麻醉科,北京 100050
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-01 修回日期:2025-12-24 出版日期:2026-08-20 发布日期:2026-09-01

Application of modified BOPPPS teaching model combined with case simulation teaching in crisis management training of anesthesia 

  1. Department of Anesthesia, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2025-12-01 Revised:2025-12-24 Online:2026-08-20 Published:2026-09-01

摘要: 【摘要】目的 探讨改良BOPPPS结合案例模拟教学在麻醉学专业学位研究生临床麻醉实践教学中的应用价值。方法 采用回顾性对照研究,以2022年9月—2024年9月就读于首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院麻醉学专业学位硕士研究生为研究对象,按照培训方法分为改良BOPPPS教学组(试验组,n=32)和传统教学组(对照组,n=33),对比两组授课方法,对比知识掌握情况。结果 试验组课程前、课程后的成绩比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。校正课前成绩后,试验组鼾症课程和脓毒症休克课程课后成绩明显高于对照组(F=31.106;F=32.803)。试验组学生的年终考核成绩和操作成绩均高于对照组(t=14.550;z=-5.057)。同时试验组学生在提升学习兴趣能力、解决问题能力方面评价和学生满意度明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 相比传统教学模式,改良BOPPPS教学结合案例模拟教学模式能够有效提高学生课前、课后成绩,年终考核以及操作成绩,且学生更易产生学习兴趣,值得在麻醉临床培训中加以推广。


Abstract: Objective To evaluate the application of  modified BOPPPS teaching model combined with case simulation teaching for postgraduates of anesthesiology professional degree in crisis management training of anesthesia. Methods This study adopted a retrospective controlled design. Postgraduate students pursuing a professional master's degree in anesthesiology at Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, who enrolled from September 2022 to September 2024, were selected as study subjects. According to the training approach, they were divided into a modified BOPPPS teaching group ((experimental group, n=32) and a traditional teaching group (control group, n=33). The teaching outcomes and knowledge acquisition were compared between the two groups. Results The differences between pre-class and post-class scores in the experimental group were statistically significant (P<0.05). After adjustment for pre-class scores, the post-class scores of the sleep apnea course and septic shock course in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (F=31.106; F=32.803). The end-of-year examination scores and operational performance scores of students in the experimental group were both higher than those in the control group (t=14.550; z=−5.057). In addition, the evaluations of learning interest improvement, problem-solving ability, and student satisfaction in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Compared with the traditional teaching model, the modified BOPPPS teaching model combined with case simulation teaching can effectively improve pre-class quizzes, post-class quizzes, outcomes of end-of-year exam and operation scores. Moreover, it is more likely to stimulate students' learning interest and is worthy of promotion in clinical anesthesiology training.