医学教育管理 ›› 2024, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (1): 100-106.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2024.01.017

• 调查研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

某三甲医院导师学术领导力评价现状及影响因素研究

李越1,  赵妍1,  卢洁2*   

  1. 1.首都医科大学宣武医院教育处,北京 100053; 2.首都医科大学宣武医院,北京100053
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-15 出版日期:2024-02-20 发布日期:2024-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 卢洁 E-mail:imaginglu@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国学位与研究生教育学会研究课题(2020MSA321)

Current situation and influencing factors of mentor academic leadership evaluation in a tertiary A hospital

Li Yue1, Zhaoyan1, Lu Jie2*   

  1. 1. Education Department of Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China; 2. Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2023-02-15 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-03-15

摘要: 目的 采用量表法调查某医院导师学术领导力及导学关系现状,并进一步分析此二者之间的关系。方法 2020年1-2月间,采用学术导师领导力、苛责行为及“领导-下属”交换关系量表抽样调查该医院在读研究生,组间差异比较采用独立样本t检验、方差分析进行,组间的相关性采用Pearson或Spearman等级相关分析及多元线性回归分析。结果 158名在读学生参与调查,受调查者学术导师领导力量表(ASLS)、苛责行为量表(ABMS)、“领导-下属”交换关系量表(LMXS)评分分别为(112.23±19.01)分、(16.26±5.55)分、(29.80±4.94)分,得分率分别为89.80%、21.70%、85.10%。分组比较后发现,不同指导频次导师在ASLS发展和激励维度及LMXS得分差异有统计学意义。导师指导频次与ASLS发展和激励维度及LMXS得分正相关,ABMS与ASLS及LMXS评分负相关,LMXS与ASLS评分正相关。可拟出回归方程ASLS=40.422-0.816ABMS+2.799LMXS(F=52.031、P<0.001、R2=0.722)。结论 不同指导频次导师在ASLS发展和激励维度及LMXS得分差异有统计学意义。指导频次正向影响、苛责行为负向影响学术导师领导力及导学关系评分,导学关系正向影响学术领导力评分。呼吁高校相关部门高度重视对导师学术领导力的认识、评价和培养,组织导师培训项目,促进良好导学关系的建立,提高导师的学术领导力。

关键词: 导师评估, 学术导师领导力, 苛责式领导力, 导学关系

Abstract: Objective This study investigated the academic leadership status of mentors and mentor-mentee relationship in a tertiary hospital of Capital Medical University and further analyzed the relationship between them.Methods Graduate students in the hospital were sampled by the Academic Supervisor Leadership Scale(ASLS), Abusive Behavior Measurement Scale (ABMS) and Leader-Member Exchange Scale (LMXS), and the differences between groups were compared by two independent samples t test or one way ANOVA, correlations among groups were analyzed by Pearson or Spearman rank correlation analysis and multiple linear regression analysis.Results A total of 158 graduate students participated in the survey. The scores of the ASLS, ABMS and LMXS were (112.23±19.01), (16.26±5.55) and (29.80±4.94). The scoring rates were 89.8%, 21.7% and 85.1% respectively. After group comparison, it was found that the scores of developing and motivating dimensions of ASLS and LMXS of mentors with different mentoring frequency were statistically significant. Mentor guidance frequency was positively correlated with scores of developing and motivating dimensions of ASLS and of LMXS. ABMS scores were negatively correlated with ASLS and LMXS scores. LMXS scores were positively correlated with ASLS scores, and the regression equation: ASLS=40.422-0.816ABMS+2.799LMXS could be deduced (F=52.031, P<0.001, R2=0.722).Conclusion The scores of developing and motivating dimensions of ASLS and LMXS of mentors with different mentoring frequency were statistically significant. The guidance frequency had positive influence and the critical behavior had negative influence on the ASLS and the LMXS, and the mentor-mentee relationship had positive influence on ASLS. It calls on relevant departments of colleges and universities to attach great importance to the understanding, evaluating and cultivating of academic leadership of mentors, organizing training programs for them, promoting the establishment of good mentor-mentee relationship and mentor's academic supervisor leadership.

Key words: mentor evaluation, academic supervisor leadership, abusive leadership, mentor-mentee relationship

中图分类号: