医学教育管理 ›› 2025, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 197-202.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-045X.2025.02.013

• 临床教学 • 上一篇    下一篇

眼视光医学专业物理诊断学实践中建立内驱力的教学方法与效果分析

陈婧12 , 张蕴1*   

  1. 1.首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院内科教学办公室,北京 100176; 2.首都医科大学附属北京同仁医院消化内科,北京 100176
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-17 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-05-27
  • 通讯作者: 张蕴 E-mail:trzhangy@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    首都医科大学教育教学研究重点课题:新医科背景下“课程思政教学工作室”有效推进临床医学专业课程思政建设路径的探索(2023JYZ025)

Teaching methods and effectiveness analysis of establishing internal drive in the practice of physical diagnosis in ophthalmology and optometry

Chen Jing1, 2, Zhang Yun1*   

  1. 1. Internal Medicine Teaching Office, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100176, China; 2. Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100176, China
  • Received:2024-05-17 Online:2025-04-20 Published:2025-05-27

摘要:

目的 在眼视光医学专业物理诊断学实践中建立内驱力的教学方法并评估效果。方法 在眼视光医学专业物理诊断学实践中,按“内驱度-发现度-活跃度-价值度-荣誉度”的层次,逐层加强学生学习的内驱力,激发学习动力;分析眼视光医学专业与“5+3”一体化临床医学专业学生物理诊断学的理论考试和实践考核成绩。结果 眼视光医学专业物理诊断学理论考试得分为(87.06±10.38)分,实践考核得分为(91.66±4.48)分。“5+3”一体化临床医学专业物理诊断学得分为(86.3±7.98)分,实践考核得分为(91.38±5.03)分。两专业学生理论考试及实践考核成绩比较差异均无统计学意义。结论 通过在物理诊断学实践中建立学生内驱力,使眼视光医学专业学生在物理诊断实践的教学效果不劣于“5+3”一体化临床医学专业。

关键词: 物理诊断学, 眼视光医学, 教学方法

Abstract:

Objective To utilize the teaching method of fostering internal drive within the practice of physical diagnosis in the field of optometry & optometry and to evaluate its effectiveness.Methods In physical diagnosis practice courses of ophthalmology & optometry, students were encouraged to gradually enhance their motivation according to the level of "internal drive degree - discovery degree - activity degree - value degree - honor degree". The theoretical and practical assessment scores of ophthalmology & optometry and "5+3" integrated clinical medicine students in physical diagnosis were analyzed.Results The theoretical examination score for physical diagnosis among ophthalmology & optometry students was (87.06 ± 10.38) points, while their practical assessment score was (91.66 ± 4.48) points. For the "5+3" integrated clinical medicine program, the theoretical examination score was (86.3±7.98) points, and the practical assessment score was (91.38 ± 5.03) points. There were no significant differences in the theoretical examination and practical assessment scores between the two majors (P>0.05).Conclusion By fostering student internal drive in physical diagnosis practice courses, the teaching effectiveness of ophthalmology & optometry students was found to be comparable to that of "5+3" integrated clinical medicine students.

Key words:

physical diagnostics, ophthalmology and optometry, teaching method

中图分类号: